STRC AlphaFold3 Computational Experiments

TL;DR: 23 AF3 jobs on alphafoldserver.com (2026-03-16 to 2026-04-21). Systematic structural investigation of mini-STRC variants, truncation boundaries, signal peptide fold impact, interaction partners, and the Ultra-Mini (1075-1775) AAV candidate. Best truncation: 1075-1775 (pTM 0.87, ranking 0.90; Ultra-Mini × TMEM145 GOLD ipTM 0.68, × full TMEM145 ipTM 0.43 with 23 interface residues in GOLD zone). Signal peptide does not break fold. Supports mini-STRC hypothesis for Misha gene therapy pathway; Ultra-Mini cleared all three AF3 gates on 2026-04-21.

23 AF3 jobs run on alphafoldserver.com (2026-03-16 to 2026-04-21). All complete. Site badge: 23 AF3 JOBS. Systematic structural investigation of mini-STRC variants, truncation boundary sweep, SP fold impact, interaction partners, and the Ultra-Mini (1075-1775) AAV clinical candidate.

New jobs (2026-03-19):

  • IgK-SP + shorter mini-STRC (700-1775): pTM 0.85, ranking 0.88, disorder 5%. SP doesn’t break fold.
  • Truncation 650-1775: pTM 0.84, ranking 0.88, disorder 7%. Worse than 700.
  • Truncation 680-1775: pTM 0.84, ranking 0.87, disorder 6%. Worse than 700.
  • Truncation 720-1775: pTM 0.86, ranking 0.89, disorder 4-5%. Slightly better than 700.
  • IgK-SP codon optimized: INVALID (DNA submitted as protein). pTM 0.23 = garbage. ⚠️ Do not count this as a valid job.

New jobs (2026-04-21) — Ultra-Mini (1075-1775) construct gating suite:

  • Ultra-Mini × TMEM145 GOLD (pruned): ipTM 0.67-0.68 across 5 models, chain_pair_pae_min 2.26 Å, 21/21 interface residues in validated zone aa 1603-1749. Direct confirmation of Derstroff-style interface on Ultra-Mini.
  • Ultra-Mini homodimer: ipTM 0.28-0.30 across 5 models, 94% C2 symmetry, 98% solvent exposure, homotypic self-contacts at aa 1579-1581 in ARM deep zone. Supports weak dimerization hypothesis over AF3 artifact. See STRC Homodimer Interface From CIF.
  • Ultra-Mini × TMEM145 full-length: ipTM 0.43 across 5 models, chain_pair_pae_min 7.18 Å, 23/41 interface residues in aa 1603-1749 zone (four of six canonical ARM-repeat clusters reproduced). Matches full-STRC × TMEM145 precedent (0.47) — no regression from truncation. See STRC Ultra-Mini Full-Length TMEM145 AF3.

See STRC AF3 Truncation Boundary Sweep for detailed truncation analysis, STRC Mini-STRC Truncation Interface Validation for superposition RMSD, and STRC Ultra-Mini Full-Length TMEM145 AF3 for the full-length closing gate.

Overview

These experiments form a systematic structural investigation of:

  1. Mini-STRC hypothesis validation (can we remove N-terminal disorder?)
  2. STRC-TMEM145 protein-protein interaction
  3. E1659A structural impact (does the mutation damage the fold?)
  4. Calcineurin-NFAT cascade validation (underpins the sonogenetic hypothesis)

Complete Results Table

#JobContentspTM / ipTMKey Finding
1Full STRC + TMEM1451775 aa + 493 aaipTM 0.47, pTM 0.48Low confidence interaction
2Mini-STRC + TMEM1451182 aa + 493 aaipTM 0.43N-terminal dispensable for TMEM145 (0.43 vs 0.47)
3STRC E1659A mutant (solo)1775 aapTM 0.64No structural damage — fold intact
4STRC wildtype (solo)1775 aapTM 0.63Baseline. 16% disordered
5Mini-STRC solo1182 aapTM 0.81Mini-STRC folds excellently (7% disordered)
6N-terminal solo (1-615)615 aapTM 0.27Confirmed intrinsically disordered
Amini-STRC + Piezo2 CED1182 + 563 aaipTM 0.30No interaction (different compartments)
8NFATC1 + Calcineurin A/BTrimeric complexipTM 0.73VALIDATED: CnA-CnB 0.91, NFAT-CnA 0.72
BFull STRC homodimer1775 aa x2ipTM 0.24No dimerization — validates Job C result
Cmini-STRC homodimer1182 aa x2ipTM 0.20No dimerization (but see Job B)
Dmini-STRC + Otoancorin1182 + 1153 aaipTM 0.29No direct contact
D2mini-STRC + Tectorin ZP1182 + 255 aaipTM 0.24No tectorin ZP binding
Emini-STRC + TMC11182 + 760 aaipTM 0.20No interaction (expected)
FShorter mini-STRC1076 aa (700-1775)pTM 0.86Better than mini-STRC! 3228 bp coding
GDelta LRR linker989 aa (594-699+899-1775)pTM 0.80Linker works but more disorder (8-12%)
HC-term only701 aa (1075-1775)pTM 0.87🏆 Best construct. 2103 bp coding, 2597 bp AAV headroom
UM-GUltra-Mini × TMEM145 GOLD (pruned)701 + 200 aaipTM 0.6821/21 interface residues in zone 1603-1749; direct Derstroff-style confirmation
UM-DUltra-Mini homodimer701 aa × 2ipTM 0.28-0.3094% C2, 98% SASA, self-contacts aa 1579-1581; supports real weak dimerization
UM-FUltra-Mini × TMEM145 full701 + 493 aaipTM 0.4323/41 contacts in zone 1603-1749; matches full-STRC precedent; no regression

Job-by-Job Analysis

Job 1: Full STRC + TMEM145 (Baseline)

  • ipTM 0.47, pTM 0.48 — below confidence threshold (>0.8 = confident, PAE <5 Å = good contact)
  • Best cross-chain PAE contacts at residues 174-185 (N-terminal region), PAE ~8.6 Å
  • Mean cross-chain PAE: 30.23 Å (essentially no confident contact across the chain)
  • Interpretation: STRC-TMEM145 interaction may require membrane context or additional partners

Job 2: Mini-STRC + TMEM145

  • ipTM 0.43 — slightly lower than full STRC (0.47)
  • Crucial nuance: the N-terminal residues 174-185 (removed in mini-STRC) showed the best cross-chain PAE in Job 1 (though still poor at 8.6 Å)
  • Despite removing the “best contact region,” ipTM barely changed (0.47 → 0.43)
  • Conclusion: N-terminal is dispensable for TMEM145 interaction, supporting mini-STRC viability
  • Full AlphaFold Server results: alphafoldserver.com (Job data downloadable as CIF/PDB)

Job 3: STRC E1659A Mutant (Solo)

  • pTM 0.64 — essentially identical to wildtype (Job 4: 0.63)
  • AF3 backbone overlay: virtually identical to wildtype
  • Alanine is small, doesn’t clash with neighbors, doesn’t disrupt hydrophobic core
  • Conclusion: pathogenicity is in chemistry (charge loss), not geometry (structure unchanged)
  • This is the “structure-function paradox”: pLDDT 95.69 + AlphaMissense 0.9016 both correct

Job 4: STRC Wildtype (Solo)

  • pTM 0.63 — control baseline
  • 16% fraction disordered (N-terminal pulls the overall score down)
  • Confirms the full protein is partially disordered even without the mutation

Job 5: Mini-STRC Solo (Residues 616-1775)

  • pTM 0.81 — substantially better than full STRC (0.63)
  • 7% disordered (vs 16% full STRC)
  • Key finding: truncated protein folds BETTER than the full gene product
  • This is unusual and strong evidence that the N-terminal is destabilizing
  • Supports not just “safe to remove” but “beneficial to remove”

Job 6: N-Terminal Solo (Residues 1-615)

  • pTM 0.27, 38% fraction disordered
  • This is the region proposed for removal in mini-STRC
  • CONFIRMED: not just flexible, but intrinsically disordered (no stable 3D structure)
  • Removing this region is both safe and beneficial for therapy

Job A (was Job 7): mini-STRC + Piezo2 CED — COMPLETE

  • ipTM 0.30, pTM 0.57 — NO interaction detected
  • Cross-chain PAE_min: 14.6-17.3 Å (essentially noise)
  • All 5 models converge: ipTM 0.29-0.30 across all seeds
  • mini-STRC chain_ptm 0.67 (folds well alone), Piezo2 CED chain_ptm 0.49
  • Conclusion: No direct physical interaction between STRC and Piezo2
  • This is expected: STRC is extracellular (stereocilia tips/TM interface), Piezo2 is membrane-embedded
  • Truncation does NOT lose a Piezo2 binding site (there was none to lose)
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-a-mini-strc-piezo2/
  • Analysis: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-a-analysis.md

Job 8: NFATC1 + Calcineurin A/B (Trimeric Complex)

  • ipTM 0.73 — strong overall complex confidence
  • CnA-CnB heterodimer: ipTM 0.91 (validates known calcineurin structure)
  • NFAT-CnA: ipTM 0.72 (enzyme-substrate dephosphorylation complex)
  • NFAT-CnB: ipTM 0.80 (co-recognition)
  • NFAT chain: chain_ptm 0.13 → chain_iptm 0.76 (disorder-to-order transition upon binding)
  • Conclusion: The Ca²⁺ → CaN → NFAT cascade is structurally validated. Underpins sonogenetic hypothesis.

Job B: Full STRC Homodimer (Critical Control) — COMPLETE

  • ipTM 0.24, pTM 0.41 — No dimerization. PAE 26-29 Å. All 5 seeds identical
  • Full STRC does NOT dimerize in AF3 solution, just like mini-STRC (Job C: ipTM 0.20)
  • CRITICAL: Eliminates concern that truncation broke dimerization. STRC self-association requires membrane context
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-b-full-strc-homodimer/

Job C: mini-STRC Homodimer — COMPLETE

  • ipTM 0.20, pTM 0.46 — No dimerization. PAE 20-30 Å
  • Initially concerning but validated by Job B (full STRC also fails)
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-c-mini-strc-homodimer/

Job D: mini-STRC + Otoancorin — COMPLETE

  • ipTM 0.29, pTM 0.51 — No direct contact. PAE 17-21 Å
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-d-mini-strc-otoancorin/

Job D2: mini-STRC + Tectorin ZP — COMPLETE

  • ipTM 0.24, pTM 0.63 — No tectorin ZP domain binding. PAE 16-17 Å
  • mini-STRC chain_ptm 0.71-0.72, Tectorin ZP chain_ptm 0.46-0.50
  • STRC-tectorial membrane interface likely requires glycosylation or membrane context
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-d-mini-strc-tectorin-zp/

Job E: mini-STRC + TMC1 — COMPLETE

  • ipTM 0.20, pTM 0.51 — No interaction with MET channel. Expected negative control
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-e-mini-strc-tmc1/

Job F: Shorter mini-STRC (residues 700-1775) — COMPLETE 🔥

  • pTM 0.86, ranking 0.88, 4% disordered — BETTER than mini-STRC (0.81)!
  • Removes residues 616-699 “transition zone” — improves the fold
  • 1076 aa, 3228 bp coding, 1472 bp AAV headroom
  • Strong therapeutic candidate: more compact, better fold, more regulatory space
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-f-shorter-mini-strc-700/

Job G: Delta LRR Linker (594-699 + GSGSGS + 899-1775) — COMPLETE

  • pTM 0.80, ranking 0.85, 8-12% disordered — Works but more disorder
  • Internal deletion of residues 700-898 (199 LRR repeats), replaced with GSGSGS linker
  • 989 aa, 2967 bp coding, 1733 bp AAV headroom
  • Not recommended: simpler truncations (F, H) achieve better fold quality
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-g-mini-strc-delta-lrr-linker/

Job H: C-term Only (residues 1075-1775) — COMPLETE 🏆

  • pTM 0.87, ranking 0.90, 6% disordered — Best construct overall!
  • 701 aa, 2103 bp coding, 2597 bp AAV headroom — enormous space for regulatory elements
  • Contains E1659 residue (our variant of interest)
  • C-terminal region is a self-contained structural domain
  • Risk: removes 60% of STRC — functional validation needed
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-h-strc-cterm-only/

Job UM-G: Ultra-Mini × TMEM145 GOLD (pruned) — COMPLETE (2026-04-21)

  • ipTM 0.67-0.68 across 5 models, pTM 0.79, chain_pair_pae_min 2.26 Å, 21/21 interface residues in validated zone aa 1603-1749
  • Direct Derstroff-style confirmation: pruning TMEM145 to GOLD domain recovers high-confidence multimer on Ultra-Mini
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-ultramini-x-tmem145-gold/, CIF at public/models/job-ultramini-x-tmem145-gold.cif
  • See STRC Hypothesis Ranking change log 2026-04-21

Job UM-D: Ultra-Mini homodimer — COMPLETE (2026-04-21)

  • ipTM 0.28-0.30 across 5 models (up from 0.20-0.24 for mini-STRC and full-STRC homodimer jobs)
  • 5-model consensus + 94% C2 symmetry + 98% solvent exposure + homotypic self-contacts at aa 1579-1581 (all 5 models) in ARM deep zone
  • Falsifies AF3-disordered-collapse artifact hypothesis; supports real weak dimerization surface
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-ultramini-homodimer/, CIF at public/models/job-ultramini-homodimer.cif
  • See STRC Homodimer Interface From CIF for full analysis

Job UM-F: Ultra-Mini × TMEM145 full-length — COMPLETE (2026-04-21)

  • ipTM 0.43 across 5 models (±0.02), pTM 0.65, chain_pair_pae_min 7.18 Å, STRC chain_ptm 0.76, TMEM145 chain_ptm 0.58, 11% disordered, no clashes
  • 23/41 Ultra-Mini interface residues in GOLD-validated zone aa 1603-1749; four of six canonical ARM-repeat clusters reproduced (1669-1680 and 1692-1707 hot-spots dominate)
  • 18 out-of-zone contacts: 12 in proximal LRR (1178-1212, likely AF3 artifact from TM-helix-in-solution placement) + 6 in pre-GPI tail (1769-1775, proteolytically removed in mature protein)
  • Matches full-STRC × TMEM145 precedent (Job 1: 0.47) and mini-STRC × TMEM145 precedent (Job 2: 0.43) — no regression from truncation
  • Low absolute ipTM explained by TMEM145’s 7 TM helices collapsing in AF3 solution (known limitation; Derstroff solved with pruning → GOLD job ipTM 0.91 published)
  • Closes the Mini-STRC delivery-score 4→5 upgrade gate
  • Data: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/job-ultramini-x-tmem145-full/, CIF at public/models/job-ultramini-x-tmem145-full.cif
  • See STRC Ultra-Mini Full-Length TMEM145 AF3 for full analysis

Key Interpretations

E1659A is NOT structural damage

The mutation likely affects a functional/binding interface (tectorial membrane adhesion), not protein stability. This is why AlphaFold (structure predictor) shows no change while AlphaMissense (function predictor) scores 0.9016 pathogenic. See STRC Electrostatic Analysis E1659A for quantitative analysis.

Three viable single-AAV constructs identified

  1. Mini-STRC (conservative): 616-1775, pTM 0.81, 1220 bp headroom. Safest bet.
  2. Shorter mini-STRC (optimized): 700-1775, pTM 0.86, 1472 bp headroom. Better fold, more space. Recommended lead candidate.
  3. C-term only (aggressive): 1075-1775, pTM 0.87, 2597 bp headroom. Best fold, maximum AAV space. Functional risk unknown.
  • Delta LRR linker approach (pTM 0.80, more disorder) is inferior — not recommended
  • N-terminal removal doesn’t significantly hurt TMEM145 binding (0.43 vs 0.47)

Full STRC does not dimerize in AF3

  • Job B (full STRC homodimer ipTM 0.24) validates Job C (mini-STRC homodimer ipTM 0.20)
  • STRC self-association requires membrane/stereocilia context — not a protein-protein interface AF3 can capture
  • This eliminates truncation-related dimerization concerns for ALL constructs

N-terminal is intrinsically disordered

Not just flexible — no stable structure at all. pTM 0.27, 38% disordered. This region includes:

  • Residues 23-114: pLDDT 30.6
  • Residues 132-251: pLDDT 37.0
  • Residues 309-387: pLDDT 38-47
  • Residues 449-485: pLDDT 47.5
  • Residues 496-615: pLDDT 31.1

Calcineurin-NFAT cascade is structurally sound

Job 8 validates the biological mechanism underlying the sonogenetic hypothesis. The trimeric complex forms with high confidence (ipTM 0.73), giving structural support to the ODE model cascade.

STRC-TMEM145 Interaction Caveat

AF3 does not predict confident direct binding (cross-chain PAE minimum 8.60 Å, mean 30.23 Å). This likely means:

  • Their interaction requires membrane context (TMEM145 is a transmembrane protein)
  • Additional interaction partners are needed
  • AF3 has known limitations for membrane-associated complexes This does NOT mean the interaction doesn’t exist — just that AF3 can’t capture it in solution.

Data Location

  • Job 1 full data: /tmp/af3_data/
  • Job 6 data: /tmp/nterm_data/
  • AF3 results directory: ~/DeepResearch/strc/af3-results/
  • Site with 3D models live from CIF: https://strc.egor.lol

Connections